Posts Tagged ‘Lady Gaga’

Oddly not that concerned about the enormous bulge from the dildo down the front of her trousers, New York has ordered a cover up of Lady GaGa’s topless Q issue. The singer can be seen on the front cover of the magazine topless with her nips almost hanging out, but for some Edward Scissor Hands-looking gloves. Despite the fact you see only a little, harmless under-boob it has been ordered by New York, and possibly other states in the US, that some form of censoring be placed on GaGa’s breast in accordance with the law. For example, see pic above.

“New York State law doesn’t permit showing anything below the nipple”, hence the horrible big white sticker you can see here. Lady GaGa’s lower boob will be available in some small independent stores in the US. [Heat]

Also Q’s website confirms the issue has problems in the US, with retail stores like Borders. The chain says most of its American branches will not be stocking the 285th edition of the magazine. They will only do so if her breast is hidden.

[Q has to] ensure all imported issues of the magazine will be sealed in a cover bag, so that bookstore Borders agree to stock it. [In Entertainment]

Further to the sneak peek from a week ago, here are the photos and interview for Cosmopolitan magazine April 2010. The cover was leaked about 10 days early after some poor, underpaid delivery boy left it on the stoop of some brothel and it was snapped by some passing stan (I’m guessing… and, it’s only a guess).

It’s always nice to see the covers properly shot, not what I always call the Glory Hole covers that look like turds by comparison. The issue, on newsstands March 9th, sees Lady GaGa more toned down, boring, and Monroe-ish than we’ve ever seen. She gives an equally underwhelming interview about her ex and her career.

(more…)

Lady GaGa is way toned down, on the April 2010 cover of Cosmo magazine. The last time we saw the singer she was at the Brit Awards, and flashing her nethers to all and sundry in a rather unseemly manner (the same manner as I do, every chance I get). Now she’s done flashing her hoo-ha, she can get on with the business of being on the cover of a women’s magazine without people whispering about whether she should be on a men’s magazine instead. She looks rather serene, for her. And she can be seen in a flesh-coloured corset and what appears to be a matching skirt. She wears her church weave, without all the pizazz, and finishes the look with a simple red lip. When the issue is released, I’ll post more.