Feb 15th, 2010
by Amy Grindhouse.
First things first. When I skim-read my own title, I thought I’d Freudian-slipped something in there about masturbation. Upon a second, slower reading of my very short post title… it seems that’s not the case. Phew. Where was I? Oh yeah.
Heidi Montag wants to jack up her face sommore, because her second round of surgeries didn’t quite screw up her formerly-pretty face enough. Montag tells Access Hollywood, as she tells anyone with a camera who will listen, that she has parts of her body that require further improvements and maintenance, in her words. At this point she can’t have that much surface-area left that has not seen a surgeon’s scalpel, after having ten surgeries on November 20, 2009.
[Heidi Montag has more plastic surgery ahead of her, according to People] “I love my boobs but I still want to improve. I didn’t get them as big as I originally wanted.” Heidi said she didn’t have anything scheduled at the moment, with more work to come “eventually… for maintenance”. The star added that she’s pleased with her recent work, which made headlines when she debuted her new look on a People cover. [Access Hollywood]
Posted in: Heidi Montag, Playboy.
Tagged: Heidi Montag
Feb 15th, 2010
by Amy Grindhouse.
Posted in: Pop Eater.
Tagged: Pop Eater
Feb 15th, 2010
by Amy Grindhouse.
- Will X-Factor crush Idol?: Here’s replacement programming 101 [Pop Eater]
- Sports Illustrated swimsuit: Bikini video [Drunken Stepfather: Site NSFW]
- John Mayer used the F-word, as well as the N-word [The Superficial]
- Celebs recall their first dates: Heidi & Seal, Kim & Reggie… [Pop Eater]
- Heidi Montag: ‘I’m [going nude in] Playboy again… soon!’ [Hollywood Life]
- Tila Tequila falls off a chair and lands in hospital… Haha [Allie is Wired]
- Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore don’t “do” Valentine’s Day [ICYDK]
- The celebs you would least like to spend Valentine’s with [Agent Bedhead]
- Kevin Smith deemed too fat to fly Southwest, tweets about it [SOMG]
- This military mother won’t be arrested for refusing deployment [Zelda Lily]
- Brooke Shields Calvin Klein commercial 1980: Flashback [Celebrity Smack]
- Does Jelly Clarkson’s butt look big in this [Drunken Stepfather: Site NSFW]
- Vernon Kay makes apology for basically cheating on his wife [Holy Moly]
- Mmmm… Oily! Shirtless Danny Young: Sexy sexy or so so? [Pop Sugar]
- Katie Price wonders why she gets so much negative press [Dirty Laundry]
- (Annoying) Madonna displaces Malawi residents over school [Ear Sucker]
- Nicole Scherzinger romantically linked to R&B star Jay Sean [Why Fame]
- Grindhouse TV: Even more specially picked celebrity gossip [Grindhouse TV]
Follow Amy Grindhouse on our Twitter or join the site’s Facebook Fan Page.
Posted in: Celeb Snax.
Tagged: Celeb Snax
Feb 14th, 2010
by Amy Grindhouse.
The Brittany Murphy Foundation is, as of Friday at the least, a charity in name alone. This will come as no shock to the many, many detractors of Simon Monjack; Widower Monjack being one of the two who set up the foundation and website, along with Brittany Murphy’s mother Sharon Murphy. TMZ did some digging, and according to state and federal records no such charity exists.
The foundation’s site has been soliciting funds since Jan., claiming they were dedicated to arts education for kids. However The Brittany Murphy Foundation isn’t registered as a charity with the IRS or California, as required by law.
The California Secretary of State’s office told TMZ there are no records for The Brittany Murphy Foundation. The state Attorney General’s office also has no record of the organization as a nonprofit group and the IRS says the foundation has not filed for a non-profit license. [TMZ]
If a non-charity solicits money they have to disclose the fact that they are not registered as a non-profit. As of Friday February 12, 2010, there was no disclaimer on the website. Furthermore, an hour after TMZ called for a comment on the findings, the website was magically down for maintenance.
Neither the foundation spokeswoman at Larkin Rivero Management, where donations were directed, nor Monjack would make a comment on the issue.
Posted in: News.
Tagged: News
Feb 14th, 2010
by Amy Grindhouse.
There are several things I love about the Robert Pattinson Details interview, for their March 2010 issue. Which is odd, as I don’t read men’s magazines and I don’t really like fuggers Pattinson. But he does give a good few sound bites about how much the nips and vaginae of the naked models on the Details photo shoot would have scared him; well, if he were actually sober for the shoot.
- Robert Pattinson says of his Details magazine March 2010 photo shoot: “I really hate vaginas. I’m allergic to vaginas. But I can’t say I had no idea, because it was a 12-hour shoot , so you kind of get the picture that these women are going to stay naked after, like, five or six hours…Thank God I was hungover….This shoot, it’s kind of ’80s nakedness, you know?” he said. “If you look at porn in, like, the ’80s, there was something kind of quaint about it, quite sweet – like this little naked community.”
The photos from the shoot and the rest of the interview are below.
Continue reading →
Posted in: Magazine.
Tagged: Magazine
Feb 12th, 2010
by Amy Grindhouse.
Tina Fey is always adorable, always stunning, and always flawless (even if The HuffPo whine about her having a scar removed from her face with Photoshop).
Fey covers the March 2010 issue of Vogue magazine. She seems like ever-so-slightly an odd choice for the cover, but only because she seems too cool and on-the-fringe to cover something so blah and mainstream. Below are more pictures from her shoot, along with behind-the-scenes video and her interview.
Continue reading →
Posted in: Fashion, Magazine.
Tagged: Magazine
