This is a follow up, to my earlier post. Yeah, I’m over this back-and-forth, too.
People who know me and know how I blog will assume, correctly, that I’m posting this follow up ONLY in the interest of presenting the other side of an ongoing debate. I posted about an hour ago, and was one of the first to spot the story, about X17 Online’s expose of the Tiger Woods sex-rehab look-alike scandal.
The National Enquirer has been in contact with me, and a bunch of other people I guess, to call BULLSHIT on the Tiger Woods sex-rehab look-alike scandal by X17.
[In an email statement sent to me, from National Enquirer] In a laughable effort to cover up Tiger Woods’ stay in a sexual addiction clinic, a Tiger lookalike was trotted out in front of a group of paparazzi at the Gentle Path rehab center Friday in Hattiesburg, Miss. The bizarre and ridiculous ruse was a clear attempt to make it look like The ENQUIRER’s exclusive photo of Tiger in rehab is not him. And even though one photo agency Web site fell for it immediately, the differences between the two Tigers are obvious to even a casual observer. Tiger’s stand-in was paraded in front of a swarm of photographers and he was wearing EXACTLY the same clothing as the real Tiger when we photographed him days ago.
At this point, this is just a game with photo/ media agencies playing “No, dude, my peen’s bigger”. I’m not that interested in whether the guy was a decoy/ or which agency is right, anymore. But this is the update, and I appreciate them reaching out. It’s a view with which Radar concurs to some degree. The HuffPo also updated their original article. I’m leaving this retarded argument here.
Feel free to jump in and speculate in the comments, and/ or vote in the poll.
