Madonna must have angered the Photoshop Gods when she threw baby Jesus back into the holy water. The singer is having a heck of a time of it right now. Not that she is probably aware of this fact as she is reportedly getting her groove on with another barely-legal pile of abs with a modelling contract. Madonna possibly having a man-hating lump of coal where her heart should be, to one side for a moment… can we take a second to address all of these Photoshop leaks?
I don’t happen to find man-privates half as amusing as I find pictures of other women’s boobies so I skipped posting the picture of Jesus Luz’s crooked, leaking weiner; the focus of said picture being Madonna’s weathered and puffy face. Well, I think that was her face. You tell me. It kind of looks like a deflated balloon with Madonna v2.0′s face on it. It’s like someone had let all the air out, cocked her wig to an angle, and instructed her to suck all the juice out of an imaginary lemon. The above is the second photo leaked in as many weeks, in which Madonna looks like she was pulled out of bed for the shoot.
A mysterious someone leaked a photo of Madonna, before being retouched for the fall 2009 Louis Vuitton campaign. The singer can be seen reclining in the same chair, in the same outfit but slightly different pose. She is Photoshopped within just about an inch of her life. Though, honestly, I thought the campaign posters were hilarious before the alleged unretouched photo was leaked.
In the gallery you can see each image in its extra large/ HQ format. Click on each image to get a closer look. There are also further images showing Madonna behind-the-scenes of the shoot, with Marc Jacobs, looking fresher than above.
Image credit to Louis Vuitton, Cele|Bitcty, NY Mag, Jezebel, and Sassy Bella.
Related Celebrity Gossip You May Like:
I think she looks terrific before they stylized the pictures. The pictures are like that by design and it has nothing at all whatsoever to do with touching up Madonna.
These are cool pictures, but even cooler is Dolce & Gabbana ‘s spring campaign featuring Madonna.
What campaign? She was axed for a YOUNGER model.
And what design? You obviously don’t know what you’re babbling about. After the creative team forwarded them to their bosses, they didn’t see the design you see.
She was photoshopped nearly beyond recognition. That’s not the reason for spending the heavy ducats on a celebrity so that people have to stare and wonder who it is, or worse, not pay it any mind.
There is a word in Brazilian slang that accurately describes Madonna today:
CACURA. That’s what happens to shit when it’s been left out in the sun to dry.
What campaign? The new spring 2010 Dolce & Gabanna campaign: http://amygrindhouse.com/madonna-dolce-gabbana-spring-2010-photos.html
And no she was not “dropped” for a younger model. Madonna signed to do last fall’s Louis Vuitton campaign and that is it. Just like Dolce & Gabanna and Versace in the past, she does ONE campaign, not some indefinite “Face Of” campaign.
And yes, the Louis Vuitton pictures were to be stylized in that matter BEFORE any pictures were taken. Those are no last-minute changes.. that isn’t how it works. The mock-ups and final design decisions are what comes first, not the other way around.
Ahem:
http://amygrindhouse.com/madonna-dropped-louis-vuitton-adverts.html
Ahem, what is amygrindhouse.com the Associated Press now? LOL.
@shle896 – You’re entitled to your view of my site, but I do source these articles. If what you are implying is that the information is incorrect, feel free to tell that to the “source/ originator” of the story. I am quite comfortable with each story, being accurate as I have researched it at the time.
Interesting that the commenter snarkly raises the “Associated Press” but still references YOUR post as her source to back up her claim.
That’s because MY post references ACTUAL PICTURES of the spring Dolce & Gabbana campaign.
If you don’t believe that Madonna is doing the spring campaign for Dolce & Gabanna, then pick up a fashion magazine or a Vanity Fair.
Then you should have referenced Vanity Fair and not the “Associated Press”.
Anyway, those who have followed my diatribes on this site since the site began know by now that there is little love lost for MANdonna on my part and a whole lot of bile to spare.
I absolute detest the woman and will not hesitate to decapitate her verbally.
But you need to chill out, smoke a L, and relax. This is the internet. It’s not real life and I doubt the real Madonna would take this as seriously as you are. She is definitely one celebrity that believes in the old adage that there’s no such thing as bad publicity.
[...] Madonna: Compare before & after retouching. (AG) [...]
Anyway, I think some people have a distinctly misguided notion about amygrindhouse.com. This is is not a fan page.
This is, to paraphrase Shakespeare, not a site were you come to praise celebrity, but to bury it.
If you say so. I didn’t realize that amygrindhouse.com was so deep and intellectual. My bad.
…actually, shle896, generally this is a place people come to read fun gossip and have friendly chats with each other in the comments sections. If you aren’t interested in either, which is your prerogative, you are free to find another site that’s more your speed.
Sorry. I actually like your site and I was merely responding to Rain’s post about Madonna’s “before” photo.
If I’d have know he or she rabidly hates Madonna, I wouldn’t have bothered.
I understand – thank you for being a reader, shle896. This is also a place where I encourage discussion. No harm done.
Somewhere in her catacombs littered with the broken, dried out bones of infant martyrs that old hag must be laughing her head off over this one Amy.
That we care enough to even pay attention – yes – indeed.