Amy Grindhouse Rotating Header Image

Kim Kardashian Photoshopped For Complex

kim_kardashian_photoshop_complex

Kim Kardashian Photoshopped For Complex (Click to enlarge)

So, a whole buncha people got their panties in a bunch today, because the ever fierce and foxy Kim Kardashian had, like, one roll of fat photoshopped, for a shot in Complex magazine.

The mess started this morning when eagle-eyed writers over at Animal New York noticed that Complex had published an image of Kardashian on their site’s ‘Web Exclusive’ gallery, in its au natural form (being that she is their latest cover girl). MooMoo Carey’s photoshoppers were then let out of their dungeon to work their magic and rub out Kimmy’s one roll of fat. The original untouched image was then removed from the gallery and the shiny re-touched one uploaded in its place.

Bitches online are calling my identical bottom twinsy fat for havin’ dem rolls taken off. Um, if she is fat, then so am I. Seriously, what of it. She is standing in a weird position that would give Parasite Hilton a roll of fat down that right-hand side. I personally think the dungeon bitches did a great job and actually they do not seem to have altered that much.

They barely touched her face at all, they rejigged the hairline a little, trimmed some excess to make her body lines smoother, cleaned up the clothing and the lighting, but isn’t that standard?

Whatever, she is hotness, so bow down and feel the fear. Vote for Kimmy!

kim_kardashian_complex_2   kim_kardashian_photoshop_complex   kim_kardashian_complex_3

Related Celebrity Gossip:

Breaking Celebrity News:

10 Comments

  1. Firecracker says:

    I don’t like this whore and she is FAT! Kidding. The difference is pretty big though when you look at her waist and legs. She looks pretty different, still a hot conceited bitch though. I wish they would make her tits smaller and not bleach her skin. So offensive.

    1. You are right about colouration on her legs and I skimmed over the fact that they lightened her skin. Didn’t wannabe whipped over commentary on that issue :P

      Also, I noticed her bubes too!

  2. Firecracker says:

    My comments don’t appear sometimes. :( I must be doing something wrong.

    Anyway, I said that a lot of weight was removed from her waist and thighs and that she’s a conceited bitch. They should have made her tits smaller too and not bleached her skin. Grrrrrr!

    1. …sent you an email about that. Sorry for any inconvenience. Think I fixed it.

  3. [...] Kim Kardashian is photoshopped for Complex Magazine (amygrindhouse) [...]

  4. chris says:

    aside from trying to rock the george hamilton look the first pic looks just dandy, but i don’t think they lightened her skin so much as the whole picture…even the background is a lighter shade of blue.

    not a fan the pulled back hair and makeup like the outside of a sarcophagus, but kim is aight in my book anyday.

    1. Loving the fierce comments today Chris. I agree, the skin is not as extreme as say the controversial Beyonce L’Oreal ad. I think it would have been better softer with her hair down too.

  5. Mystery Man says:

    i must give props to Kim. She looks ultra hot in these pics. So what if she had one roll of fat. just shows that unlike 99% of the other women in Hollywood she actually eats more than lettuce and water. There wasa time when that one roll of fat wouldn’t have mattered. *SIGH* poor Kimmy. Hope she doesn’t develop a comples and go on a crash diet and get her ass lipo’d off. If she does, I’m gonna hunt down these magazne photoshop people and go postal!!!!

    1. She is gorgeous right. I think she is talentless but fierce for a reality star. She’s too proud of her curves to slim down.

      1. Mystery Man says:

        exactly, even if she is dating that ab machine reggie bush whp wants her to lose weight. dumbass!