Comments on: Gisele Vanity Fair Cover Worst Sales for 2 Years

By: AmyGrindhouse

AmyGrindhouse — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:16:57 +0000

Thanks for sharing Pencils.

I think Gisele shares from a common celebrity afflication, not being able to think for herself or give an interview without a PR person feeding her answers. Her lack of cognition of how those specific comments would sound out of context is what finished her off.

By: Pencils

Pencils — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:50:34 +0000

I actually feel kind of bad for her, I think she had no idea how terrible it would sound when she talked about her stepson. I think she truly cares for the little boy, and that can only be a good thing. I’m a stepmom myself and it’s a really fine line you have to walk. Still, those were some really unfortunate quotes and I think she’s lost a lot of fans.

Also, not a very hot picture, and really dull headlines. Not that I would be caught dead reading Vanity Fair anyway. Bo-ring. Wonder what the best-selling issue of the last two years was?

By: AmyGrindhouse

AmyGrindhouse — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:54:54 +0000

Hey hey Fred, long time no see. May I say your Avatar is particularly badass!

The stiff, a-sexual cover and the boring headlines were the nail in the coffin. Yup.

By: Fred Smithson

Fred Smithson — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:41:00 +0000

Yeah sure, blame the naked girl… I thought people were supposedly buying this thing for the articles. What was the top headline? — “The Prince and The Paper” — oooh sounds fascinating.

By: Double Nonfat Blood of My Enemies Links » Ayyyy!

Double Nonfat Blood of My Enemies Links » Ayyyy! — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:08:41 +0000

[...] Gisele’s Vanity UnFair (AmyGrindhouse) [...]

By: AmyGrindhouse

AmyGrindhouse — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:51:57 +0000

Welcome to the site and thanks for the comment Alexis – I agree actually, and the same goes for Vogue. It’s over-priced 50% full of adverts and the rest is full of dull dull features. HA!

By: AmyGrindhouse

AmyGrindhouse — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:46:53 +0000

I’m surprised people do think it’s cos she looks fuggers. I asssumed it was because of all that stupid BS with her wedding rumours and the beby thing.

By: Alexis

Alexis — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:56:21 +0000

It sold poorly because no one but fashion designers give a flying fuck about her and her body looks disgusting. I’m literally repulsed by the length of her torso. She looks like fucking Gumpy. Doutzen Kroes is the new supermodel. Her body is toned and BANGIN’.

By: Mystery Man

Mystery Man — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:14:09 +0000

Personally, I think she’s overrated, but this has to…and iwll hurt her career. can we say downslope?

maybe now she can actually eat and be normal…NAH!!!! lol

By: Busy Bee Blogger – Celebrity Gossip can be sweet!

Busy Bee Blogger – Celebrity Gossip can be sweet! — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:27:22 +0000

[...] Gisele Bundchen is naked and no one cares-Amy Grindhouse [...]

By: AmyGrindhouse

AmyGrindhouse — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:27:20 +0000

I used to at be kind of indifferent, but the whole “her kid is my kid” thing was retarded. Blegh.

By: Firecracker

Firecracker — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:51:17 +0000

I’m so happy to hear this, I can’t stand Gisele!!!

By: AmyGrindhouse

AmyGrindhouse — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:19:45 +0000

The readers were turned off by her bizarre antics for sure. And yep, I love that someone with a face like that is accused of being too fuggers to sell magazines!

By: Pauls

Pauls — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:08:39 +0000

The baby/baby daddy snatching is the underlying culprit for sure. I don’t think Vanity Fair’s average reader is into that or anyone who openly is. Take that sh!t to OK mag.

Beth Kseniak is FUNNY.