A DNA test has proved that actor Keanu Reeves is not father to some random Canadian woman’s adult child. The woman in question, Karen Sala, accused Reeves of fathering at least one of her four children. However, a DNA test proved that Reeves is not the father.
Karen Sala, 46, was perhaps seeking DNA tests out of love. Perhaps she wanted to prove fatherhood, in order to have Reeves in her childrens’ lives, because he would make such a snazzy father who would love them very, very much. Or perhaps she wanted cold, hard cash from the millionaire actor, in the form of back child support. Oh yeah, it’s totally the latter. She wanted $150,000 per month in child support, retroactive from 1988, and $3 million a month in spousal support retroactive from 2006. All this despite Reeves’ assertion that he doesn’t even know Sala.
Image credit to RAM/Fame Pictures. Story and info. via TMZ.
She must have been living under a rock for the better part of the last century.
Most everyone agrees that Keanu has no fondness for the female gender.
Too funny, this woman seems to me to be out for what she can get. I don’t know why these people embarrass themselves, the test isn’t going to prove something that is not true.
“I don’t know why these people embarrass themselves, the test isn’t going to prove something that is not true.”
Simple. She either has no knowledge of how science works or just doesn’t have any faith in it, believing that maybe if the kid kinda looked like Keanu, that must mean her kid’s genes “looked” like Keanu too.
She must live in Canada’s version of the Appalachian Mountains, probably in the Kootenays. These people don’t get out much and when they do they are blinded by all them purty lights.
[...] Keanu Reeves did not put his bomb in that lady’s bus. Or something like that. (AG) [...]
It’s probably good that he cleared all doubt from everyone’s minds forever including his own, but I feel that it sets a bad precedent for potential future judicial abuses of the rest of us whose basic rights are already threatened.
We have a right to not have to take blood tests simply because others want a piece of our lives. We have to fight any court that would subject us to such tests when there’s no evidence that we are guilty of anything. The burden of proof should not be placed on us to prove our innocence without others having clear evidence against us.
The end