Jon Hamm’s piece in Elle UK is gaining a lot of traction for the same reason Daniel Craig did in GQ UK calling the Kardashians ‘f**king idiots.’ And Johan Hill did calling the family a ‘disgusting part of our culture.’ Hamm says the same, basically, calling Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, and reality stars of that ilk, famous for being stupid and easy incurious morons ‘rewarded significantly’ for their idiocy which is a ‘valuable commodity.’ He gives a great interview, below.
It was revealed yesterday that Kim Kardashian secured herself a nice tax write-off by donating twice the $176,000 value of her wedding presents to the Dream Foundation and sending people a belated thank you card along with all the air she returned (kudos for giving money to charity, even if she benefited from it, shame for keeping the gifts). Oh, yeah. She kept the wedding presents. Which I’m going to take to mean she opened them all because guests for a fake wedding should get the real gifts bought with real money returned once the fame-whore bride tires of the charade and files for divorce. And now TMZ.com reports that Humphries wants his estranged wife to return the gifts, because ‘gifts from a fraudulent wedding should be returned.’ Humphries thinks Kardashian could have donated AND returned the items because ‘he feels the guests were duped into spending their hard-earned cash on wedding gifts… Kim never intended to give their marriage a real chance.’ Photos of Kardashian in Beverly Hills Feb 24.
Here’s Kim Kardashian wearing nude lipstick, heavy nose-contouring (it looks too ‘angular’), heavy eye makeup, and false lashes, that can be seen from several feet away, in a photo captioned: ‘sweatpants hair tie chillin with no make up on!’ And, yes, it’s apparent they’re song lyrics. That doesn’t really change anything.
IDK. This is part of a more long-winded story in Lies&Style Magazine, the details of which you can read HERE. Ray J appears to be shilling a book about his relationship with Kim Kardashian (I’m not even going to go in about the timing of the release, following Whitney Houston’s death). In a book about cheating men, co-written by Ray J, it’s suggested they made the tape in 2003. A year before Kardashian’s first divorce, from first husband Damon Thomas, in 2004. And Ray J corroborates Thomas’ claims, and Amber Rose’s claims, that Kardashian is a cheater. ‘KK pursued and slept with [me] while she was still married to her first husband.’ Ray J recalls in the book. ‘To be honest, the whole thing started off wrong. We’d known each other for a while before we dated and there was a mutual attraction, but she was married. She let me know she wanted to get with me. She left her [first] husband for me as soon as we started having sex and things between us got intense really fast. After that, I felt obligated to be with her.’ And Kardashian hypnotised with her urinal cakes. Imagine that. ‘We were like animals,’ he adds. ‘Sexually free to try anything, and we did. For years, KK and I had a great sex life. There was more to our relationship, but the majority of it was about our wild and extreme sexual chemistry. She was a straight freak who was down to do whatever, whenever and that seriously hypnotised me.’ They eventually cheated on each other. But MEH. ‘I had no respect for her,’ says Ray J. ‘I wanted more for my life…[to] find a woman that I could actually trust.’
Nope. Despite half-hearted reporting to the contrary by people who may want to visit their optometrist SOON, there probably isn’t a new Kim Kardashian tape.
Tepid reports surfaced on MediaTakeOut.com this week alleging: ‘[We] just got wind that some people on the Internets are saying that Kim Kardashian has a [new] sex tape. We can not confirm the authenticity, but the pics show a woman who looks like Kim K s**king off some White dude… Can’t say for sure who that is in them pics but it sure looks like Kimmy!’ Some speculated that Kris Humphries was the disembodied junk in the uncensored still. However, there’s a reason for the generalities. Were MTO to actually look at the pictures (that I can’t link but I looked… for science), they’d see it’s not Kardashian. And I mean, you’d have to be a buffoon or visually-impaired to think it’s her. It’s OBVIOUSLY not her, if you’ve seen the photos. MTO’s own commenters point out it’s a pr0n star called Jasmine Waltz. RumorFix.com sources concur: ‘[it's] definitely NOT her.’
Following the revelation that QuickTrim is basically 50% snake oil and 50% caffeine, Page Six reports that there’s a possible lawsuit on the horizon for Kim Kardashian and Khloe Kardashian for marketing the alleged scam product.
In a suit that, honestly, sounds like a fishing expedition based on one complainant and a grain of truth, there’s a potential class action lawsuit since the pills don’t aid weight loss but offer so much caffeine in one hit they could be pretty dangerous. Of course, this comes from the family who pushed pre-paid Kardashian Kards on kid fans and copy and pasted whole purse/ jewellery/ clothing lines from real designers for their assorted Kardashian Kollections.
Page Six reports the law firm bringing the suit is approaching people to join the complaint against QuickTrim and the Kardashians for marketing the product because ‘The active ingredient in QuickTrim weight loss products is a large dose of caffeine. The FDA has determined that caffeine is not safe or effective for weight loss.’ 10 photos of Kim Kardashian around Los Angeles February 21.
© 2012 Amy Grindhouse | Privacy Policy | Sitemap |
