Jennifer Aniston covers and gives interview with Elle September 2009.

In case you were wondering, yes, this is the annoying “spinster” interview that has been quoted over the last few days. The actress is trying her hardest to convince her remaining fans that she is on the cat lady waiting list and before you know it she’ll be head-to-toe in knitwear, rocking back and forth dribbling about the days when she used to have  a working reproductive system. She brings this on herself. She really does. For the record, I think she looks stunning in the photo spread (below). And, I think she would be a fierce crazy old cat lady.

• On being lonely: “I’m not going to ignore the pink elephant in the living room. It’s fine. I can take it. If I’m the emblem for ‘this is what it looks like to be the lonely girl getting on with her life,’ so be it.”
• On counting on her sense of humor to get her through tough times: “I remember being seven and asking my mom if I was as pretty as [my best friend] Monique. And with all the love in the world, my mom looked at me and said, ‘Oh, honey, you’re so funny.’ So, she doesn’t lie to me… She answers the question by not answering and instead tells me what she thinks is my greatest strength… I can make fun of myself. And I’ll bring it up as long as the world is bringing it up.”
• On supporting others: “I support women, men, anybody who is in a place that’s not their strongest and who is ready to push forward.”

Jennifer Aniston’s Elle magazine September 2009 pictures below.

Grant Wilfley Casting Seeking Extras for the film, “The Baster” (Manhattan)

This may not be quite the weirdest request for a movie extra out there with all the kooky people playing some of this crap for laughs, but it’s sure up there. Let’s see, the producers for Jennifer Aniston’s upcoming movie ‘The Baster’ are asking for their extras to have some weird ass requirements.

The movie people are checking on Craigslist for something other than used porn DVDs and late night hookups. They posted the above, where they say they want to hire two extras to stand about all day and have profanities shouted at them. But not just any old person. Nooooo.

In the post, they say they want a “heavy set woman” and a “woman with a round face, small eyes, and upturned nose” to have profanities shouted at them in a scene for the movie. They’re also looking for a skinny boy with bad acne. (Who may or may not get sworn at too).

Before you all come rushing forward saying you are just the hot bitches they are looking for, only crazy people and those living withing NYC can apply. Weird.

Image courtesy of TMZ.com

Seems that Star Magazine has been lie-telling… who knew?

The often controversial and shockingly sometimes right, trashy celebrity magazine, Star, earlier in the week reported that John Mayer was set to make mad dollar selling his and Jennifer Aniston’s sex secrets and more in tell all book. $10 million they claimed, for all sorts of sordid and embarrassing secrets.

Only, it seems that the rumours were untrue.

There is NO book deal/ tell all in the works/ money at all. Mayer found out that Star had published the story and apparently he is so pissed about the book rumours that he is considering legal action. 

Through his rep the singer denies the story from Star, “Even for them, its a new low. They’ve dressed themselves up but they’re no better than the Enquirer.” 

He continues, “Despite their low standards it’s still not ok to make up stories and print them. Unfortunately, while we’re considering legal action, Star Magazine is already at work on next week’s cover story about some reality tv star’s secret marriage to Elvis.”

Jennifer Aniston has stated the obvious in a new interview by saying she knows in LA if she ever gains weight or allows the dreaded middle-aged spread to creep in she will become out of work.

“I’m a realist,” Aniston, 40, tells Britain’s Elle magazine. “I know that if I eat nothing but burgers and chips, I’m not going to be hired for the parts I normally would.”

“That might be fine one day, but not right now.”

Image credit to Splash News.

So, according to People.com, Jennifer Aniston and John Mayer have been engaging in joined-at-the-hip fakery for an entire year now!

Well, smack me in the face with a rotten carrot. Who knew it was possible for two people to stay together for so long, when they look more uncomfortable together than Tommy and Katie, and have less chemistry than them too…

According to People, when Aniston first met Mayer at an Oscar party in 2008 she was insistent she “barely knew his music.”

One year later, the two were the reigning “It” couple at this year’s ceremony following a surprise appearance by Aniston as a presenter with Mayer as her date. The very public outing, complete with handholding and kissing, capped off a whirlwind year for the off- and on-again couple.

“At some point, you feel comfortable and say, ‘This is the choice I want to make,’” Mayer told Ryan Seacrest on his KIIS-FM morning radio show Wednesday.

WHAT DO YOU THINK about this couple dating for a year?

Image credit to Russ Einhorn / Splash News.

Jennifer Aniston has been dishing out unwanted and unsolicited dating advice.

Aniston shared her dating stories and retold one particular tale of a messy date where she went home with stained clothing (clean that filthy mind, you).

She says:

“I was on a date with this guy … there was a cherry tomato and he bit into it and it was all over my white dress. So that was just one side note. No cherry tomatoes!”

When discussing her current dating woes, the actress continued:

“It’s not fun. You could end the date and shake hands with them and realize it doesn’t work, and all of a sudden you’re a new couple.”

The actress is currently promoting her new movie, He’s Just Not That Into You.

Image credit to Splash News.

Jennifer Aniston has done the world a favour by turning down an offer to pose in Playboy magazine [Website – Amy Grindhouse].

Hugh Hefner offered Aniston $4 million to pose. He also left the option open for her to earn up to $10 million as a reward for high sales.

By “reward for high sales”, one can only assume that Hefner was trying to subtly goad Aniston into putting her progressively sagging old lady parts on show again. The remaining 10 fans that Maniston has, from her Friends days, have already seen ‘the girls’ in GQ, so I’m guessing flashing her Britney is the only thing that would boost sales?

Forgive me for going on a tangent for a second, but do people still buy fucking magazines anymore, much less glorified porno magazines? I was under the impression that if one chose to look at soggy old lady parts then all one had to do was Google it and *POOF* there it would be. I can’t even remember the last time I bothered to buy a magazine. Cosmo fucked me up the arse one too many times and now I have sworn off them. More chance of me buying and reading a GD book! 

Anyhoo… Maniston saved my eyes from the horror of having to Google this shit WHEN it leaked on the Interwebs. Sources claim “the 40-year-old star isn’t interested in showing off any more of her body, and turned down the offer”.

Celebrity news and gossip written by AmyGrindhouse.com.  Image credit to Splash News.

Jennifer Aniston (pictured above on the set of  ’Marley & Me’, with co-star Owen Wilson) has stolen the crown for Top Christmas Box Office Movie 2008, from her ex, Brad Pitt [Website – Amy Grindhouse].

Both movies opened on Christmas day. Aniston’s latest film, ‘Marley & Me’, kicked butt and scored a number one at the box office, forcing ex-hubby Brad Pitt’s ‘The Curious Case of Benjamin Button’, into the number 2 position. Which kind of sucks ‘cos from what I have heard, ‘Button’, is the FAR better film.

The Top 5 Christmas Movies were:

1. Marley & Me raked in $14.6 million 
2. Button came in second with $11.8 million
3. Bedtime Stories took $10.5 million
4. Valkyrie took  $8.3 million
5. Yes Man took  $5.8 million

[IMAGE CREDIT: Splash News Online]

AmyGrindhouse.com © written by Amy Grindhouse. Content including images, branding and original writing may not be used or republished without prior license or permission.

Jennifer Aniston has admitted that the now infamous GQ cover of her, wearing only a tie and a smile, is the product of Photoshop, not just of her working out at the gym [Website – Amy Grindhouse].

The 39-year-old actress made the freakin’ obvious confession about her GQ cover, when she appeared on The View, on Wednesday. According to US Weekly:

“What happened to the girl next door from Friends?” Barbara Walters asked, holding up the January issue, where Aniston appears wearing only a tie. ”She’s there! Photoshopped!” Aniston, 39, replied. At one point, a laughing Aniston flipped the cover over, saying, “let’s put this down.”

Her take on what happened? ”There was a story behind this,” the Marley & Me star explained. “This had a whole concept. It was going to be in various stages of undress. There was going to be me in a gown and men in tuxedos. And then it would be me wearing the man’s shirt. And he would have no shirt on. And then they were supposed to get naked! Somehow I don’t know what happened!”

Asked by View co-host Joy Behar if she had been tricked, Aniston quipped, “they got me bombed!”

Man, I am so upset to learn this. I totally thought the man-abs and absence of sagging chichis was the work of yogalates, not MooMoo Carey’s photoshop b*tch. I should have known. Her abs were indeed rockin’, but her face looked jacked up. Or, maybe it wasn’t so much that the Photoshopper made it look jacked up. Maybe the LACK of the famous “spinster scowl”, that Aniston sported on the cover of In Touch for like the last 10 years, made her virtually unrecognisable!

[IMAGE CREDIT: Splash News Online]

AmyGrindhouse.com © written by Amy Grindhouse. Content including images, branding and original writing may not be used or republished without prior license or permission.

Jennifer Aniston and John Mayer can be seen in the image above,  leaving dinner at Il Mulino in Greenwich Village New York City [Website – Amy Grindhouse].

Isn’t it so cute when couples match. The borderline Emo twinsies are co-ordinating the different shades of charcoal in their ensembles. Is the choice of colour palette ‘cos they are getting dressed in the dark? I hear they have their sexy times in the dark, so getting dressed again in the dark is not such a stretch!

[IMAGE CREDIT: Ron Asadorian/ James Devaney/ Splash News]

AmyGrindhouse.com written by Amy Grindhouse © All rights reserved. When quoting, use excerpts with attribution only. Images, branding and original content should not be reproduced without prior permission.